Tag: ruthann ziegler

  • Citrus Heights city hall ‘on target’ for completion by September

    New Citrus Heights city hall, in progress
    An in-progress view of the new Citrus Heights city hall, taken on Jan. 21, 2016. // CH Sentinel

    Updated Jan. 22, 9:44 a.m.–
    Construction of the new $22 million Citrus Heights city hall is “on target” for completion by September of this year, according to the project’s manager and City officials.

    After beginning work on the project last July, Project Manager Tyler Gahagan said structural steel went in earlier this month, followed by a roof being put on the 35,000-square-foot facility last week. Currently, he said crews have started metal stud framing and are installing plumbing and electrical.

    Gahagan said some site work had been slowed down by rain, which caused cement trucks to slip and slide in the mud, but he said the new hall is on track for completion by mid-September.

    The new hall features a single-story design, along with an adjacent 4,000-square-foot utility yard. Its new location is on a 10.9-acre parcel just north of the post office on Fountain Square Drive, about a block away from where the old city hall was located.

    Approved unanimously by councilmembers last March, the new hall project included authorization for Dignity Health to construct a three-story medical office building in place of the old city hall, at the corner of Fountain Square Drive and Greenback Lane. Demolition of the former hall was completed in November, and a groundbreaking ceremony for the new hall was held in July of last year.

    [Related: Citrus Heights leaders break ground on new city hall project]

    According to Monica Alejandrez, who serves as assistant to the city manager, Panattoni Development submitted plans for the new 68,727-square-foot medical building, but a specific start date is unknown. She estimated construction would begin in spring of this year.

    On its website, the City calls the new hall and medical building project “a unique public-private-partnership,” which it says will generate more than 170 jobs and result in a “direct investment of $53.2 million into the Citrus Heights economy.”

    [Image: Click to see official drawing of what the new city hall will look like when complete]

    The new single-story hall will house 65 city employees, who were previously stationed in four separate buildings at the old hall. Staff are currently located in a temporary city hall facility being leased in the Grand Oaks Shopping Center on Auburn Boulevard. The hall was moved in July 2015 to allow for demolition work to begin.

    Background

    The new city hall project caused some controversy among residents during discussion tracing back to 2013, with concerns about increased traffic, construction noise, and whether a new hall was needed. Supporters, like the Citrus Heights Chamber of Commerce and city council members, billed the project as good for jobs and a cost-efficient way to replace an aging hall without incurring debt.

    [Related: Council votes 5-0 for new city hall & MOB; lawsuit threatened]

    The city manager’s office previously released figures saying the net impact of the new hall to the City’s general fund would only be about $8.9 million after 15 years, largely due to a $6.9 million lease agreement with Dignity Health for use of the old hall grounds, as well as projected energy savings from a new, more efficient city hall facility.

    [follow text=”Follow local news:”]

    A lawsuit filed by the group Preserve Our Civic Center is still ongoing against the project, with a Sacramento Superior Court hearing scheduled for April 1, 2016. Norman Hill, a representative for the group, said the lawsuit seeks to stop the project from moving forward, due to alleged violations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
    Hill said a "key" issue involved in the lawsuit regards traffic impact from the new medical building and city hall, a "major impact" he believes was "concealed" from the public, in violation of CEQA. Prior requests for comment from city officials regarding the lawsuit have been referred to Ruthann Ziegler, the city attorney for Citrus Heights. Ziegler replied Wednesday afternoon to a Sentinel request seeking the City's perspective and response to the lawsuit, as well as if progress had been delayed on the project due to the lawsuit. In a short email statement, she said "progress on both the MOB and the new city hall is continuing," but did not comment on the lawsuit. [Related: Judge denies motion to halt Citrus Heights city hall demolition] Last July, Judge Timothy Frawley denied a motion from Hill's group which sought to temporarily bar the City of Citrus Heights from proceeding with plans to demolish the old city hall. Although that attempt was unsuccessful, Hill said he's hopeful "some kind of compromise settlement" can be reached with the City through the legal process, but said specifics couldn't be addressed due to the ongoing nature of the lawsuit.

  • Lawsuit filed against Citrus Heights over MOB, new hall

    Lawsuit filed against Citrus Heights over MOB, new hall

    A lawsuit was filed against the City of Citrus Heights last week by a group alleging “noncompliance” with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) on a recently approved new city hall and three-story medical office building (MOB) project.

    The lawsuit, initiated by the nonprofit group “Preserve Our Civic Center,” asks the Sacramento County Superior Court to declare the City’s approval of the new hall and MOB project to be “invalid and void,” and that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project “fails to satisfy the requirements of CEQA.” It also asks the court to order a “new legally adequate” EIR for the project, and require suspension of all contracts related to construction on the project until alleged violations of CEQA are addressed.

    The $53 million project was unanimously approved by the city council on March 26, authorizing the aging city hall to be torn down and replaced with a 68,000 square feet Dignity Health medical building. A new $22 million city hall would then be built next to the Post Office down the street on the 10.9-acre Stock Property, paid for in part by a 15-year lease agreement with Dignity Health.

    In legal filings, Preserve Our Civic Center identifies itself as a group “composed of persons whose economic, personal, aesthetic, health, and property interests will be severely injured if the adoption of the Project is not set aside pending full compliance with CEQA and all other environmental laws.”

    The lawsuit alleges “deficiencies” in the City’s several-hundred page EIR, including “an inadequate project description, and an inadequate analysis regarding impacts to transportation and circulation, air quality, biological resources, land use, and noise.” The lawsuit alleges that such deficiencies will result in “significant environmental impacts.”

    The CEQA-required EIR is a detailed analysis of potential environmental effects for certain projects, with “significant” effects being required to be adequately mitigated, reducing the effect to “less than significant.” The Report must also include an analysis of alternatives to the project, assessing if other options may create less effect on the environment.

    Citrus Heights resident Norman Hill, who heads up the group filing the lawsuit, said the EIR “seemed to be designed to understate the effects, so that the City would not have to deal with mitigation.”

    [Read the final version of the EIR and traffic study here: http://www.citrusheights.net/836/Environmental-Impact-Report]

    Citing the legal complaint filed by Hill’s group, Monica Alejandrez with the city manager’s office referred comments to City Attorney Ruthann Ziegler, who was unable to be reached by phone or email on Friday.

    City council members were aware of the likelihood of a lawsuit prior to their vote to approve the final EIR and authorize the project to go forward, as Hill had threatened litigation previously.

    “Mr. Hill, I’m sorry that you feel the way you feel,” Councilman Jeff Slowey told Hill during the March 26 council meeting. “But threats, they don’t bother me in the least bit. If you wanna go to court I say bring it on — but bring your checkbook.”

    [Prior story: Council votes 5-0 for new city hall & MOB; lawsuit threatened]

    Hill said the council “just blew off anything that called for a reduction of the impacts,” and should have done more to address issues like aesthetics, traffic, and glare, highlighting concern for neighbors who would see “this three-story monstrosity” from their homes and neighborhoods. He acknowledged the City made an improvement by switching the new hall location away from a previously proposed site on Antelope Road, but said it “unfortunately” seems that lawsuits are “what people have to do to be heard by this City.”

    [Related: New City Hall Site Option Draws Support, While Medical Building Criticized]

    Hill, a retired environmental attorney, said he looks forward to a CEQA-required settlement conference between his group and the City, hoping City officials will be “willing to talk.”

    “Ideally we’d like to see the MOB back on the Stock Property, but I’m not sure how much success we’d have with that,” said Hill, who has also proposed an alternative two-story MOB design. “I think there may have to be some give-and-take between us and the City.”

    *Editor’s note: this story will be updated with comments from the city attorney, if reached. For more context on this story, see: Council votes 5-0 for new city hall & MOB; lawsuit threatened

    [follow text=”Get local news updates:”]