Tag: body cameras

  • Supervisor Frost: 3 reasons why I support body cameras

    Supervisor Frost: 3 reasons why I support body cameras

    Guest opinion column by County Supervisor Sue Frost–
    It is a difficult time to be a police officer in the United States. While it may or may not be fair, incidents across the country have left many people feeling deeply negative towards how officers handle difficult situations. In response, many departments are equipping their officers with body cameras.

    Sue Frost, supervisor
    Sue Frost

    Related: Citrus Heights police chief says body cameras ‘likely,’ but too early

    I bring this up because it was recently announced that the Sacramento County Sheriff will soon be conducting research to identify possible vendors to supply the department with body cameras for officers to wear. In a day and age where transparency, accountability, and building trust are more important than ever for departments across the country, I applaud our Sheriff for seriously looking at implementing this emerging technology.

    I have three main reasons for supporting body cameras.

    First, the video collected by body cameras helps juries paint an accurate picture of what happened in an incident. Whether that comes in the form of helping convict more criminals, or proving the innocence of the accused, society is better off for it. It will also provide clarity in cases of suspected police misconduct, as corrupt police officers will be more likely to be caught, and the honorable ones will be more likely to be exonerated.

    Speaking of police misconduct, my second reason for supporting body cameras is that it causes improved behavior by everyone involved. Officers tend to be on better behavior when they know they are being watched, and the likelihood of citizens acting aggressively towards officers also diminishes. It also allows officers to review their own footage and improve how they handle their interactions. Speaking personally, when I was interviewed on TV for the first time I cringed a little as I evaluated my performance, but it served as a great learning opportunity and helped me improve.

    My third reason is because it quantifiably reduces complaints and related expenses, as departments across the country are seeing positive results. In one study performed by the Rialto police department, it was found there was a 60% reduction in use of force incidents and an 88% reduction in the number of citizen complaints. I also believe these cameras could present a fantastic opportunity for the Sheriff’s Department to give the public a good idea of what the average day is like for an officer and potentially highlight the everyday good that officers do for our community.

    From Oct: Supervisor Frost: Here’s a hidden reason why homelessness is exploding

    But while there are numerous proven benefits to recording police interventions, there are also potential pitfalls, and this makes the careful approach the Sheriff is taking all the more important.

    Like all new technology, there are large upfront costs associated with the cameras. This cost takes the form of the physical cost of the cameras themselves, and also the cost of storing the evidence and public records requests. While agencies certainly save time collecting and managing digital photographic evidence – video evidence requires an investment in either cloud-based storage systems or physical storage hardware, both of which are expensive.

    I also have concerns about personal privacy while officers are in private residences and how evidence that could impact the outcome of a trial would be managed. Additionally, there’s also the problem of doing too much too fast, as when you have been doing the same job for twenty or more years, it can be a challenge to suddenly change procedures.

    But these issues should be solvable. It seems clear that bodycams for our deputies could be worthwhile if we implement them carefully, and based on initial results from other agencies who are using bodycams, they can potentially add clarity and save money in the long run. The Citrus Heights Police Department will benefit by this as well. There are many lessons that they can learn from the Sheriff’s Department, who share most of their jurisdictional borders with Citrus Heights.

    Sacramento County Supervisor Sue Frost formerly served as a Citrus Heights councilwoman and currently represents District 4, which includes Citrus Heights. She currently is seeking input on a community survey which can be taken online by clicking here. She can also be contacted at (916) 874-5491, or SupervisorFrost@saccounty.net.

    What do you think of body cameras? Submit a letter to the editor or opinion column for publication: Click here

  • Citrus Heights police chief: body cameras ‘likely,’ but too early

    Citrus Heights, police chief
    Citrus Heights Police Chief Christopher Boyd highlighted details from a study on body cameras last week. (File photo, CHSentinel)

    Updated Aug. 20, 8:58 a.m.–
    Body-worn cameras on police officers could likely become a future reality in Citrus Heights, Police Chief Christopher Boyd told somewhat-wary city council members in a presentation last week that summarized pros and cons his department had identified in a council-requested study on the issue.

    “I do think this is likely in our future,” the police chief said regarding body cameras, indicating it’s the direction law enforcement is moving toward. “I think there’s a lot of good reasons to have the technology, but I think there’s a lot that needs to evolve in the technology itself.”

    Citing general benefits found during his department’s study, Chief Boyd told council members various agencies have reported improved accountability, performance and police behavior after introducing body-worn cameras, with other benefits including better evidence-gathering and the possibility to prevent or resolve “frivolous complaints” against officers. But the chief said the study also found camera benefits differ from department to department, largely depending on the level of trust between the community and police.

    Addressing several concerns about the technology, Boyd highlighted privacy issues involved in entering a private home with a camera rolling, the possibility of witnesses being unwilling to cooperate on camera, and the potential for “massive releasing” of video records under California’s Public Records Act. He estimated that requests for public records of the video footage would be “enormous,” and said additional staff time and costs would be involved to “review, redact and scrub” the records of any non-releasable portions prior to release.

    The chief also told council members body-worn cameras could send a signal to officers that there’s a lack of trust within the department, but said “most all” of his officers would “embrace” the technology, if implemented. He said the Citrus Heights Police Department (CHPD) tested out various body cameras for several months in studying the issue, but currently have none in use.

    [Also on The Sentinel: Citrus Heights police roll out new 2015 patrol SUVs]

    City Attorney Ruthann Zeigler also added her perspective during Boyd’s presentation, telling council members there’s “a tremendous number of unanswered questions” about the use of body cameras — referencing privacy issues, public records requests, and concerns about recording minors.

    Boyd said new local policies to handle these concerns could be crafted, but cautioned that cities could end up with “very little local control,” pending the outcome of body camera legislation currently in the California legislature that could end up dictating such policy at the state level.

    “I think we have an interest to wait and to watch and see how police might ultimately be regulated under new laws enacted with this kind of technology,” Boyd told the council. “It might be in our interest to make sure we know, before we own technology subject to regulation – what that regulation might be.”

    [follow text=”Follow local news:”]

    Boyd said estimated costs involved would include $64,000 to purchase cameras for 80 officers, $250,000 for related staff and IT technician costs, and an annual cloud-storage cost of about $100,000. For an alternative cost of about $300,000 every five years, Boyd said the City could purchase its own servers to host the estimated 300 terabytes of data needed to store and backup video footage. The chief said actual costs were difficult for his department to estimate, citing unknowns like how much staff time would be involved in responding to public records requests, how long videos would be required to be stored, and under what conditions body cameras would need to be recording video.

    Council members react:

    Although no action was planned or taken on the body camera issue following the police chief’s August 13 council meeting report, all five city council members expressed their reservation over implementing the technology in Citrus Heights, citing concerns like cost and questioning if the cameras are really necessary.

    “In Citrus Heights we really don’t have the problems they have in Baltimore or Ferguson,” Mayor Sue Frost said during the meeting. “I don’t ever get complaints about how our police act in our community – I get compliments.”

    “I’m not a fan of body cameras at this point,” said Councilman Mel Turner, commenting that the push for body cameras seems to be a reactionary approach to what’s going on in other parts of the country. “I like to take the proactive approach, which is to make sure we hire the right officers in the first place, so we don’t have to have these problems.”

    “If you’re having a problem, I would be all for it,” said Councilman Jeff Slowey. “But knowing – at least today – that we’re in a good place with our police department, I personally would be a little hesitant to jump out and spend that kind of money.”

    Council members had previously requested the police department study the costs and ramifications of body-worn cameras following national discussion on the topic over the past year, according to Mayor Frost. She said no action related to implementing cameras is anticipated in the near future.


  • Citrus Heights This Week: what’s happening in town (Aug. 10-16)

    Citrus Heights This Week: what’s happening in town (Aug. 10-16)

    Signs_city_20150110_151012Events around Citrus Heights this week include Food Truck Mania, a city council meeting, and the annual Hot August Bites at Rusch Park — which organizers say will feature 300 classic cars in the Auto’s for Alzheimer’s classic car show.

    August 11: Known as National Safe Digging Day, Citrus Heights council members passed a resolution in support of the day this year, highlighting the effort to raise awareness to possible dangers of digging and the free services available by calling 8-1-1.

    Also on Tuesday: A free “How to develop an idea into a business” workshop is being offered by the local Citrus Heights chapter of SCORE. The workshop is designed to help share tips on evaluating an idea and successfully expanding it into an actual business, and will be held from 1 to 3:30 p.m. at 6501 Sylvan Rd., in the Small Business Administration building. (Registration link)

    [Related: Local nonprofit offers small biz owners free classes, mentoring]

    Aug. 12: A swarm of food trucks will once again descend on Rusch Park from 5 to 8 p.m. on Wednesday, as part of a new 2015 Food Truck Mania summer event series at the park. Continuing through September, the array of food trucks and live music will be out in the park on the second Wednesday of each month.

    Aug. 13: On Thursday night, city council members will hold the first of two regularly scheduled council meetings for August on Thursday, with several items on tap for discussion. According to the meeting agenda, council members will begin with a closed session discussion related to current litigation against the City related to the city hall and medical office building project. Acceptance of a state grant for children exposed to domestic violence, as well as approval of a contract with the state Board of Equalization to receive a “utility user tax” on prepaid mobile services are also on schedule. A police department report on a study of body-worn cameras is also listed on the agenda for Thursday night. The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. in the Citrus Heights Community Center on Fountain Square Drive.

    [Document: Full agenda packet for August 13, 2015 city council meeting]

    Aug. 15: Hot August Bites and the Auto’s for Alzheimer’s classic car show will again take over Rusch Park for a second annual night of entertainment, live music, food, raffles and swimming. The event is scheduled from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. (See story)

    Coming up: check back next week for more details on the upcoming 6th annual Veteran’s Appreciation Picnic, a blood drive at Sunrise Mall, and more.
    [follow text=”Follow local news:”]
    <<Don’t see an event you think should be on here, or have an upcoming event you want to let us know about? Click here to contact us.>>

  • Boyd recalls challenge, ‘honor’ of leading Cal Police Chiefs Assoc.

    Citrus Heights Police Chief Chris Boyd, police interceptor SUV. Photo credit: Luke Otterstad
    Citrus Heights Police Chief Christopher Boyd stands in front of several of CHPD’s new Police Interceptor SUVs.

    Citrus Heights Police Chief Christopher Boyd recently finished a one-year term as president of an association representing 334 police chiefs across California, calling it an honor and major highlight of his career — as well as a challenge.

    “Just getting into my term, we were really thrown with some national issues that we had to quickly adjust to,” said Boyd, referencing Ferguson, criticism of police use-of-force, and what he called “police-community trust” issues. Additionally, Boyd said the California Police Chiefs Association had to respond to state legislation brought forward relating to these national issues.

    While still maintaining his position as Citrus Heights police chief, Boyd said he quickly re-focused the state-level association by forming workgroups related to national issues like police militarization, body-worn cameras, privacy, and community trust. He said the workgroups are still in the process of developing “best practices and procedures,” with results expected this summer.

    With a paid staff and an office downtown, the non-profit Cal Chiefs association was founded in 1966 to serve as “the voice of and resource of choice” for municipal police chiefs across the state.

    Calling legislation “a big, if not the bulk” of what Cal Chiefs addresses, Boyd said one of his term’s accomplishments was to hire another full-time lobbyist — bringing the association’s total up to two lobbyists.

    “We’re either battling bad legislation that we believe would hurt our ability to protect the public, or we’re carrying forward legislation that we think will help us do our jobs better,” Boyd said of Cal Chiefs’ main task.

    The 48-year old police chief also said a key accomplishment was developing relationships in the Capitol with leaders like Governor Jerry Brown, who he said has been “good for law enforcement.” Boyd said he was honored to have a close connection with the governor, describing it as a “cell phone relationship” – although he said Brown “doesn’t text.”

    He credited such relationship-building as a factor in why Governor Brown vetoed all three bills Cal Chiefs requested a veto on last year, including AB 1327, which would have imposed restrictions on future law enforcement use of drones in both private and public places without a warrant, according to Boyd.

    Reflecting on his term, the chief said he’s “probably most proud” of helping “secure” $40 million in the state budget to aid police departments in handling probationers released under a 2011 “prisoner realignment” law – which he said increased the number of “supervised status” prisoners on the streets by about 10 percent in Citrus Heights, and around the state. Boyd said there’s now “well-over a thousand” felons on “supervised status” in Citrus Heights, with the funds secured being vital to help local police keep an eye on those they consider most likely to re-offend.

    [follow text=”Want more stories like this? Follow us”]

    Cal Chiefs also played a heavy role in opposing last year’s Proposition 47, an initiative which reduced penalties for certain nonviolent drug and property crimes.

    Boyd called the proposition “bad for public safety,” and although unable to persuade the majority of California voters to oppose the proposition, Citrus Heights city council members unanimously passed a resolution against Prop 47, at the chief’s request.

    [Related: Citrus Heights council votes 5-0 to oppose Prop 47]

    Since passing the presidential torch on to Chula Vista Police Chief David Bejarano at the end of last month, Boyd said Cal Chiefs is currently sponsoring legislation including a marijuana regulation bill authored by local Assemblyman Ken Cooley (D-Rancho Cordova), and SB 262 regarding drone use.

    Recalling the time commitment required to serve as president of the state-level chiefs association over the past year, Boyd said he couldn’t have done it without a trusting community, a supportive city council and manager, and a police department “who really stepped up” to run day-to-day operations while he was away.

    “You really have to have all those things to do this well — and I did,” said the Citrus Heights chief. “And I feel blessed for that.”