Tag: Zima Creason

  • Union-backed candidates lost all school board races in Citrus Heights. What happened?

    From left to right, Tanya Kravchuk, Ben Avey, and Steve Miller, all beat teachers union-backed candidates in their races for seats on the San Juan Unified School District’s governing board in 2022. // Images source: Sanjuan.edu

    This article is a subscriber-exclusive, made possible by the support of The Sentinel’s full-access subscribers. Important, local stories like this deserve to be told, but take significant staff time to produce. Please consider a subscription to make more stories like this possible.

    By Sara Beth Williams–
    Three of the four school board candidates backed by the San Juan Teachers Association lost in their bids to win or keep their seats on the San Juan Unified School District’s governing board in 2022 — a sharp contrast from the 2020 elections when all three teachers union-endorsed candidates won.

    The San Juan school board is responsible for approving an annual budget and setting policies and goals that affect approximately 40,000 students throughout the entire district, which includes Citrus Heights, as well as Carmichael, Arden-Arcade, Fair Oaks and Orangevale.

    Four seats were up for grabs on the seven-member board during the November 2022 elections, with three of those seats covering areas in Citrus Heights. Although school board positions are listed as non-partisan, the 10 candidates running ranged in political affiliation from far-right to independent, as well as Republican and Democrat.

    According to the teachers association’s website, the SJTA endorsed Zima Creason of Area 3, Mike McKibbin of Area 5, Ray Ward of Area 6, and Murad “Moe” Sarama of Area 7.

    Final election results were released Dec. 7 and Creason was the only SJTA-backed candidate to be re-elected, with her seat representing Carmichael and part of Arden-Arcade. Former Citrus Heights City Councilman Steve Miller won in Area 7, representing most of Citrus Heights.

    Parent activist Ben Avey won in Area 6, and Tanya Kravchuk, a mom of four and a small business owner, unseated school board President Mike McKibbin in Area 5. Avey and Kravchuk were elected in areas that cover a portion of Citrus Heights.

    What made 2022 different?
    Frustration from parents over COVID-19 policies in the school district, as well as changes in how school board members were elected may have played a role in the outcome of November’s election.

    San Juan Unified School District’s new 7-member trustee area map, for 2022. // SJUSD

    In 2022, the district transitioned to electing school board members by trustee areas, rather than electing them district-wide. School board member candidates were required to live in their local trustee area and were also elected only by those in that same area, rather than district-wide.

    That meant political endorsements from the major parties could have played a larger role in the outcomes this year, depending on the political leanings of each area. Of the winning candidates, Miller and Kravchuk were both endorsed by the Republican Party, while Creason was supported by the Democratic Party of Sacramento County, and Avey ran as an independent.

    The district also expanded its ranks from five members to seven members, creating two open seats with no incumbents.

    Avey, who won his Area 6 seat and also was founder of the San Juan Parents Association, said in an email to The Sentinel that the 2022 election results confirmed what he’d heard throughout the community both before and during his campaign.

    “People wanted a change and we offered them a viable alternative to the status quo.”

    The San Juan Parents Association endorsed three candidates in total, Avey said, including Kravchuk. Kravchuk has been vocal throughout many interviews regarding the need for more parental rights, and more district transparency.

    “San Juan Unified must build trust with parents, teachers, and community partners by making each stakeholder a part of the decision-making process,” Kravchuk wrote on her website. She and Avey were also both critical of the district’s response during the pandemic.

    According to an article in the Sacramento Bee, several parents in school districts across Sacramento County ran for school board positions with strong “parental rights” agendas. The paper reported that in the neighboring Sacramento City Unified, Natomas Unified, and Folsom-Cordova school districts, a “parent revolt” didn’t materialize in the election, but results indicate a different outcome in San Juan Unified.

    Information from Capradio.com showed that six out of 10 candidates in the San Juan district listed being a parent of school-aged children as one of their motivating factors in choosing to run for the school board. Three other candidates indicated that all of their children had grown up attending San Juan schools.

    The Democratic Party of Sacramento County could not be reached for comment before publication deadline, but attorney and GOP political consultant Matt Rexroad told The Sentinel last month that parents of school-aged children have been “frustrated” for several years by the district’s policies and overspending. He said teachers unions are known to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to elect “puppets” on schools boards in the region.

    In the race for Area 5, incumbent McKibbin spent more than twice what Kravchuk spent to unseat him, with the local teachers union contributing more than $26,000 to the race. After all votes were counted, however, Kravchuk held an 8-point lead over McKibbin.

    From December: Meet the MVHS grad who unseated San Juan’s school board president

    Avey expanded on the frustrations that many parents held during the Fall of 2020, in his CapRadio interview. When asked about why he was running for school board, Avey outlined the difficulty he and other parents had in both accessing COVID-19 information from the district, and in having a dedicated space during board meetings where their concerns over COVID-19 distance learning and other related policies could be heard.

    “In each case our argument was simple: parents see firsthand the impact of district policies on our kids,” Avey wrote in an online Q&A.

    In an email to The Sentinel following his election, Avey said voters recognized the importance of having parents on the school board.

    “In fact, voters were confused when we explained that four out of five board members didn’t have school age kids,” Avey said.

    According to Capradio.com, Creason was the only board member, before the election, with a student still attending school in the San Juan district.

    Miller, who won his race for the Area 7 seat, agreed that families’ concerns should be heard, and said in a phone call to The Sentinel that he hopes to further open communication with parents and families within Citrus Heights so they can come and voice their concerns.

    Asked for comment on the outcome of the recent election, SJTA President Barry Roth did not address questions regarding why union-backed candidates may have lost in November. In a brief email reply, he said members of his association “have and will continue to build strong working relationships with school board members, because in the end, we have a shared goal of having a high-quality education system for all students.”

  • School Board: Who’s running in San Juan Unified School District?

    San Juan Unified School District candidates: top left to right, Zima Creason, Alex Zamansky, Jeffrey Perrine, Michael McKibbin, Tanya Kravchuk. Lower: Ben Avey, Ray Ward, Murad Sarama, Oleg Shishko, Steve Miller. // Images from SJUSD/Youtube

    Updated Oct. 29, 10:14 a.m.–
    By Phillip Pesola– Ten candidates are running for four seats on the San Juan Unified School District Board of Education in the Nov. 8, 2022, election. Trustee areas three, five, six, and seven are up for election, with areas six and seven being newly created.

    Below are highlights of each candidate, taken from their website, ballot statements, and the most recent financial disclosure forms. Candidates who did not have the most recent disclosures filed for donations through Oct. 22 have information cited from Sept. 24 filings, if available.

    Trustee Area 3

    • Zima Creason. First elected to the board in 2018, and currently serving as the board’s vice president. Has a child attending district schools. Key issue: ensuring access and opportunity for all. Top donor: San Juan Teachers Association ($5,250). Total contributions: $21,559, as of 9/24. Endorsed by the Democratic Party of Sacramento County and the San Juan Teachers Association. Website: voteforzima.com
    • Alex Zamansky. Attended Bella Vista High School, father of two, with daughter attending school in district. Key issue: “Kids in. Politics out.” Total contributions: $6,460, as of 9/24. Top donor: unclear. Endorsed by San Juan Parents Association. Website: alexforschoolboard22.com

    Trustee Area 5

    • Jeffrey Perrine. Attended San Juan schools from K-12, and now has two children attending. Key issues: concern about “indoctrination in education and mandates.” Member of controversial Proud Boys group. No financial filings posted, as of 10/24. Website: jeffreyperrine.com
    • Michael McKibbin. Currently serving as the SJUSD board’s president. First elected to the board in 2014. Son graduated from Casa Roble High School. Key issues: prioritizing students, empowering teachers. Key donor: San Juan Teachers Association ($26,530). Total donations as of 10/24: $36,705. Endorsed by the California School Employees Association and the San Juan Teachers Association. Website: mikemckibbin.org
    • Tanya Kravchuk. District alumna, mother of four. Key issues: Parental rights, increasing teacher pay. Key donor: self, $1,215. Total contributions: $6,527 as of 9/24. Endorsed by the Sacramento Republican Party and Citrus Heights City Councilman Bret Daniels. Website: tanyakravchuk.com

    Trustee Area 6

    • Ben Avey. Graduated from Del Campo High School, and has three children currently attending district schools. Key issue: Parental voice, COVID-19 policy. Key donor: Chris Hansen, $2,000. Total contributions: $12,075, as of 9/24. Endorsed by Sacramento Association of Realtors, Sacramento County Supervisor Rich Desmond. Website: benavey.com
    • Ray Ward. Currently serves as the Chair of the Board of Directors for the Citrus Heights Chamber of Commerce. Daughter graduated from schools in the district. Key issue: technical education options. Key donor: San Juan Teachers Association, $4,697. Total contributions: not posted, as of 10/24. Endorsed by Citrus Heights Planning Commissioner Andrew Van Duker and Citrus Heights Chamber Executive Director Diane Ebbitt. Website: vote4rayward.com

    Trustee Area 7

    • Murad “Moe” Sarama. Has a child enrolled in the district. Key Issues: Collaboration, prioritizing safety and security. Key donor: San Juan Teachers Association PAC, $3,598. Total contributions: not posted, as of 10/24. Endorsed by Citrus Heights Mayor Porsche Middleton and the Democratic Party of Sacramento County. Website: www.sarama.vote
    • Oleg Shishko. Served as a board member for CHASEN and Neighborhood Area 6, and has two children nearing school age. Key issues: parental rights, opposing mask/vaccine mandates. Key donor: personal loan, $1,824. Total contributions, $2,159, as of 9/24. Endorsed by Citrus Heights Vice Mayor Tim Schaefer and Councilman Bret Daniels. Website: voteoleg.com
    • Steve Miller. Has served on the Citrus Heights City Council since 2005. Son attended and graduated from district schools. Key issues: increased test scores and better funding. Key donor: Chamber PAC, $1,500. Total contributions, $2,975, as of 10/24. Endorsed by the Sacramento County Republican Party. Website: None

    Those interested in learning more about where each candidate stands on a variety of issues can find 25-minute interviews with each candidate posted on the district’s website: www.sanjuan.edu/boardelection.

    Questions asked in the interviews discuss school safety, changes in school start times, declining enrollment, ensuring high quality education, bond money, mental health, district fiscal health, union influence, combating hate and bias, and expanding student voices.

  • San Juan school board candidates address problems with Citrus Heights schools

    Citrus Heights, school board
    Moderator Ray Riehle speaks during an Aug. 30, 2018, forum for San Juan Unified School District school board candidates. // Image credit: Youtube/Floobydust41

    Sentinel staff report–
    Citrus Heights has long been criticized for having under-performing schools operated by the San Juan Unified School District, which has City leaders concerned that young families won’t be attracted to move to the area and has also led to parents finding ways to send their children to schools outside the city limits.

    Charter schools have been suggested as a possible solution by several Citrus Heights City Council candidates, but candidates for school board are split on whether charter schools are a good idea.

    In just over two weeks, election ballots will begin being mailed to Citrus Heights residents, and voters will have an opportunity to elect two board members out of a field of four candidates running for school board. Candidates were divided on issues discussed at a recent forum at Citrus Heights City Hall, including their position on whether open enrollment is a good idea and why test scores are low in Citrus Heights.

    Highlights from candidate answers are included later in this article.

    Candidates will face-off again on Sept. 24 in another local candidate forum, to be held from 6-7:30 p.m. at the Mesa Verde High School Performing Arts Center. According to the District’s website, the forum will feature a panel of students and/or parents who will ask questions to the candidates.

    Who’s running?
    Newcomers in the race include Myel Jenkins, Magali Kincaid, and Zima Creason, who all have children currently attending schools in the District. Mike McKibbin, whose son graduated from a school in the District and whose wife teaches part-time at Grand Oaks Elementary, is the only incumbent seeking re-election. Current board member Greg Paulo is not seeking another term.

    Each of the newcomers carry a significant endorsement list, with Creason and Jenkins carrying endorsements from the Citrus Heights Chamber of Commerce Political Action Committee, as well endorsements from the Sacramento County Young Democrats and the California School Employees Association, San Juan Chapter 127. Kincaid’s endorsements include the Green Democrats of Sacramento and County Supervisor Phil Serna, while McKibbin’s website does not have a section listing endorsements — although during his last campaign he was endorsed by the Sacramento Bee and the Democratic Party of Sacramento County.

    None of the candidates live in Citrus Heights, as the only local resident to express an intention to run for school board was Citrus Heights Planning Commissioner Tim Schaefer, who later announced he had decided to forgo plans to run for school board this year.

    The four candidates were all invited to a forum hosted by the Citrus Heights Chamber of Commerce PAC at the end of last month. Creason was the only candidate to not attend. Excerpts of each candidate’s answers to several questions asked are included below, along with a video link to watch the full 1.5-hour forum.

    Question asked: As a whole, test scores in Citrus Heights tend toward the lower range of schools in the district. Why do you think that is? What ideas do you have to address the issue?

    Kincaid: “I don’t think that this is an isolated issue. I think that our District can use a lot of help, and not just in test scores, but in making sure, again, that we’re looking at and prioritizing our students as a whole person, not just as a test score.

    “…And we also need to teach our students just how to take a test. It definitely is a skill that you don’t — we are not born with this: how well to take a test. We need to make sure that we’re also helping our students learn how best they can learn and providing them the right opportunities.”

    Jenkins: “It’s a multi-tier approach. It’s not one answer solves it all. So it’s looking at the continuum of our students from before they enter. We know that we have a diverse community, and not all of our kids are able to access preschool and are able to come into kindergarten, kindergarten-ready. So if we’re not coming in kindergarten-ready, we start to fall behind.

    “So what kind of early education programs can we do to help kids become kindergarten ready? San Juan’s starting on that path and has piloted, for lack of a better word for me, like a ‘boot camp’ a week before so students can get ready to enter kindergarten… It’s (also) looking at family engagement.”

    McKibbin: “I want to point my answer to talking about three of the schools that are here in Citrus Heights. The first one is Grand Oaks where my wife teaches part time… When they came on the first day of school, they were welcomed. The teachers were saying, ‘I need you here. It’s important that you’re here all the time.’

    “Second school, first day of school, I was at San Juan High School. First of all, their freshman class is the largest freshman class they’ve had in five years… We’re giving the PSAT for free and that gives the kinds of experiences in terms of test-taking that kids need and also teaching them how to do that.

    “The third school is Sylvan. Sylvan is a middle school, and for those kids, once again, we’re tapping their imagination. We have a Maker’s Lab there that takes the kids and says, ‘it is important for me to be in school and I really want to be here…’ [T]he idea is that we indeed have to have the un-ending support of our kids and they will perform.”

    Question asked: What is your opinion of charter schools?

    Kincaid: “As a value, as a personal value, I do not believe that our public taxpayer dollars should be going to fund private education. So that is my fundamental value where I stand. I understand that we have charter schools in our District and I know that we have (charter) students in our District, so I want to make sure that any charter school that exists in our district is not only held accountable — and accountable to the community and the students and the parents who are sending their students to that charter school — but also transparent.

    “…[F]or me, accountability and transparency is important and I don’t believe that we currently have that with our charter schools.”

    Jenkins: “One of my sons, after being at Northridge for some time, we realized that the traditional teaching approach wasn’t a fit for him and we had to figure out as a family what are we going to do, because if he gets disengaged in fourth grade, we have no chance of getting to high school. And for us, we had to make a family choice and we ended up going to a charter that has a Waldorf approach.

    “…[W]e need to ensure that our charters are accountable, that they are providing high quality education, that there is transparency and that they’re doing what the law had intended in the beginning, and that was to provide innovative teaching approaches. And part of that original intent 20-some years ago was that if there were charter’s doing innovative approaches, they were sharing those best practices, so to ensure that we have that as well.”

    McKibbin: “As a school board, we have relatively little control over the dependent charters. Independent charters, and we have one of those, we have more control of — but for most part we have relatively little control over charters.

    “…There are some really good charter schools. I helped start one in fact called High Tech High in San Diego. They pick their students by lottery. They have a very, very technical curriculum and indeed they are serving a purpose in that community. But most of them are, indeed, private schools in drag.”

    Question asked: The District has an open enrollment policy. What is your view on open enrollment? What are the strengths and weaknesses? Is it a problem? Why or why not?

    Jenkins: “…[O]pen enrollment is a weakness in some way because it pulls down from the neighborhood schools having the opportunity to be strong, to have the kids from their neighborhoods go to that school.”

    “I recognize some of the strengths of it, to give family choice, but I recognize that it doesn’t allow us to make all of our schools gems of their neighborhood and community. And that’s what we want.”

    McKibbin: “First of all, I have supported open enrollment in my years on the Board, and mostly because we think that parent choice is a premier priority in our school, that parents ought to have the choice of what school their kids can go to.

    “The second reason is because it allows schools to have a particular kind of focus… if you look at the schools in Citrus Heights, they all have joined a consortium to be STEAM schools, to emphasize science, technology, engineering and math. It gives them an opportunity for those schools to come together because of the notion of choice. But as Myel said, there are disadvantages.”

    Kincaid: “Very plain and simple: Having open enrollment allows for segregation to happen… I live in the Arden area and I’ve lived there for over 20 years. And I see what happens when my neighbors’ kids and my neighborhood kids in general get pushed out of the good schools and they have to attend a school that’s miles away.

    “…Choice is great. Choice is wonderful, when the choices that you have would be from a large amount of quality schools that offer arts and music and enough supports to make sure that all students are succeeding. But we don’t necessarily have rapid learner program at every school. We don’t have the IB program at every school. So when you have to pick the school, or there’s not enough room for your student at the school, it creates problems.”

    To watch the entire forum online, see video below: