Tag: Laura’s Law

  • Guest Column: Why I changed my mind about Laura’s Law, treating mental illness

    By Sue Frost–
    Many of you may have recalled me writing about Laura’s Law in the past, as well as other measures in Sacramento County to address the growing concern around mental health.

    When I previously wrote about Laura’s Law, it was from the perspective of an ambivalent public servant with an impending decision on whether or not to implement the law in Sacramento County. Now I want to write from the perspective of someone who decided to support Laura’s Law and is excited to see what we can achieve with this new tool at our disposal. If you have not been following along, I will provide a refresher.

    Laura’s Law was signed into law in 2002 following the tragic death of a young woman in Nevada County by a man with severe, untreated mental illness. Laura’s Law established the ability for counties to provide for assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) of individuals who pose a threat to themselves and those around them. For those sentenced to AOT, it means they will be connected with mental health treatment they otherwise may have resisted or simply not had access to.

    Since its creation, a majority of large counties in California have adopted Laura’s Law and those that have, have seen significant improvements in their communities.

    Successes for communities that have implemented Laura’s Law have many looks. Success looks like health improvements with reductions in hospitalizations and homelessness.

    It also has a financial component. As I am sure you can imagine, the costs associated with treating the mentally ill in hospitals, in shelters, and even in jails, are substantial. Counties that implement Laura’s Law naturally see their expenses relating to hospitalizations and incarceration go down as the mentally ill take up fewer beds in either facility.

    In Nevada County, the origin of Laura’s Law, those reductions were 46.7% for hospitalizations, and 65.1% for incarcerations. Most notably, Nevada County saw a 61.9% reduction homelessness, something I am sure we can all agree would benefit Sacramento County.

    So why now has Sacramento County decided it was time for Laura’s Law? In the past, the county had explicitly opted out of Laura’s Law. It was before my time on the Board, but as I understand, there were originally concerns for the cost associated with providing AOT. Then, I am told that the County was confident it had provided adequate resources for those most in need of mental health resources.

    Following legislation passed last year, the County was put in a position of either opting-out again, or automatically being opted-in. To opt out, the County would have had to submit a compelling reason for doing so. This required a thorough assessment of current service available in addition to community outreach. Ultimately, the decision came to the Board of Supervisors.

    Even with the information available to me, I initially did not support Laura’s Law. I had personal liberty concerns with forcing people to receive treatment. Still, I maintained an open mind, and as I often do, I asked my constituents for their views on the issue.

    One stood out more than others, as a constituent approached me at a community meeting and shared with me the story of her son and gave me a book that discussed the realities of serious mental illness. I found the story compelling and it truly helped me understand the need for Laura’s Law.

    It helped me understand more about Anosognosia, also called “lack of insight.” It is a symptom of severe mental illness experienced by some that impairs a person’s ability to understand and perceive their illness. It is the single largest reason why people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder refuse medications or do not seek treatment, and we are not helping these people by sitting back while they suffer.

    AOT is a simple but effective tool that can save not only the lives of those afflicted with mental illness, but it can improve the lives of everyone around. Especially those closest to them.

    I am confident that we have given a tool to Citrus Heights PD, Mercy San Juan, and the countless number of people and organizations working to get our homeless population under control. I am glad that we have finally embraced Laura’s Law and I look forward to seeing how it helps our community improve our health and well-being.

    Sue Frost, supervisor
    Sue Frost

    Sacramento County Supervisor Sue Frost formerly served as a Citrus Heights councilwoman and currently represents District 4, which includes Citrus Heights.  She can be contacted at (916) 874-5491, or SupervisorFrost@saccounty.net.

    Want to share your own thoughts on this topic or another local issue? Submit a letter to the editor or opinion column for publication: Click here

  • Guest Column: Mental illness is a problem we should handle better in Sacramento County

    By Sue Frost–
    This summer the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors will have a big decision to make regarding whether or not to implement “Laura’s Law.” I want to take this opportunity in my monthly article to explain to you what this law is, why this is coming before the Board of Supervisors, and why it is such a big deal.

    Laura’s Law is named for 19-year-old Laura Wilcox, who was a college student working in a Nevada County mental-health clinic in 2001 when she and two others were shot and killed by a man with untreated severe mental illness. After the incident, Laura’s parents chose to advocate for assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) for individuals who meet strict legal criteria and who, as a result of their mental illness, are unable to voluntarily access community mental health services.

    Since then, California counties have the option to “opt in” to the program, and that has been done so far in most of the larger counties. To date, Sacramento County has been one of the few larger counties who has not opted in and has never held a public hearing at the Board of Supervisors regarding whether or not to implement the program. This “opt in” would impact not just the unincorporated county, but cities like Citrus Heights as well.

    This process changed, however, with the passage last year of AB 1976, which requires counties like Sacramento to hold public hearings at the Board of Supervisors about whether we will “opt in” or “opt out,” and if we choose to “opt out” we have to provide specific reasons for this to the State. The deadline for Sacramento County to have this hearing and formally decide will be July 1 of this year.

    Earlier this month a mentally ill homeless man assaulted a child on Freeport Blvd. in Sacramento, only to be released back into the public in less than 24 hours – and this was after he had been captured and released previously for assault and battery of another woman. As a former emergency room nurse, I understand firsthand that there are people living in our community who cannot take care of themselves, and they desperately need help.

    People like this should be able to get help before more crimes are perpetuated in our communities – it’s the compassionate and safe way to move forward. I do not know how I will vote on this issue when it comes before me, as I want to have an open ear to both sides as well as be able to fully comprehend the fiscal impacts, but I do know this is a growing problem and we should be handling this problem better than we are right now.

    Sue Frost, supervisor
    Sue Frost

    Sacramento County Supervisor Sue Frost formerly served as a Citrus Heights councilwoman and currently represents District 4, which includes Citrus Heights. She can also be contacted at (916) 874-5491, or SupervisorFrost@saccounty.net.

    Want to share your own thoughts? Submit a letter to the editor or opinion column for publication: Click here