Tag: Defund Police

  • Town Hall: Frost discusses homelessness, schools, COVID relief, defunding police

    https://www.facebook.com/308349223421220/videos/467679371264418

    Sentinel staff report–
    Sacramento County Supervisor Sue Frost on Monday held her first live-streamed town hall of the year on Facebook, answering questions from constituents ranging from COVID-19 relief, reopening schools and businesses, homelessness, and crime.

    By Friday, the town hall broadcast had been viewed over 7,000 times and had drawn nearly 300 comments.

    In opening remarks, Frost said around $182 million was allocated to Sacramento County from CARES Act funding last year and said followup funding of around $330 million is potentially coming to the county, pending relief legislation being approved at the federal level.

    Frost also said “there’s a chance” the county will enter the less-restrictive “Red Tier” within the next week, but indicated there would be a two-week delay before more reopenings could occur.

    A summary of the supervisor’s answers to various questions from constituents are included below:

    Homelessness
    Frost said programs like hotel vouchers and other programs are in place, or are being developed to address homelessness, and said the county is “doing everything we possibly can to create more opportunities for shelter and permanent housing.” She said the county is also working with local Homeless Assistance Resource Teams (HART) to help offer winter shelter, but said “the problem always comes down to money and resources.” Several commenters on Facebook criticized her for not doing more to address homelessness.

    Reopening schools
    Frost called school closures “devastating” to students, in response to a question about whether she was working with unions to address challenges faced by students during school shutdowns. Although expressing support for reopening schools and youth sports, she said the decision is outside of her purview on the County Board of Supervisors and instead encouraged parents to talk to school districts and state officials.

    School choice
    Asked whether she would support a “school choice” measure, Frost said: “If our school system can’t provide the education we need, we should have a choice to take our children somewhere else.” The term school choice typically refers to families being given the option to enroll their children in public school alternatives and receive funding vouchers to assist with tuition.

    Vaccines
    Addressing another question about schools and vaccines, Frost said school reopenings are not tied to vaccinations for teachers, noting that schools largely can’t reopen while the county remains in the most-restrictive “Purple Tier.” She said the county is getting closer to entering the “Red Tier,” when all schools are allowed to reopen under the state’s blueprint for reopening. Frost also said anyone wanting a vaccine should be able to get one, but said the county is not the “central receiving agent” for vaccines in the county. She said the county is one of many agencies and providers who have received a limited number of vaccines for distribution.

    Reopening businesses
    In a brief response to a question about why California is more restrictive than other states, Frost said areas of the country that shut down earlier and longer have suffered more “devastating damage” than other states. She said: “I do know we need to reopen California. We need to do it as safely as we can and as quickly as we can. And that is something I am advocating for.” Frost also said in response to another question that she opposed efforts to fine businesses for not complying with COVID-19 requirements, advocating instead for a focus on educating businesses.

    Tier models
    Frost continued her criticism of the state’s categorization of “tier” classifications by county, arguing in favor of a more targeted, zip code-based model.

    Side shows
    Frost answered a question about street racing, focusing her attention on “side shows” that have occurred around the county where large numbers of vehicles have taken over parking lots, with cars sometimes spinning out and engaging in reckless driving. Frost said she’s hopeful for more funding and cooperation with the California Highway Patrol in providing helicopter assistance, “because if not, somebody’s going to get killed one of these days.”

    Defunding police
    Asked about efforts to defund law enforcement, Frost said the “defund police” phrase can mean different things to different people. Citing closures of mental health institutions in past decades, Frost said police are now expected to handle situations that may be better addressed by other professionals and said she is supportive of looking at ways to “create or shift resources” to help address “gaps in our mental health system.”

    Police presence
    Responding to a question about increasing police presence to reduce theft and vandalism, Frost said “right now our police services should be prioritized and we should have as many boots on the ground as we can.” She said if a proposal to do so were to come before her, she “would vote yes.”

    Mental health
    Responding to a comment advocating for more mental health funding, Frost expressed support for prioritizing mental health and said the county is working on implementing a “pilot program” to have social workers assist law enforcement on certain calls. She also cautioned about potential risks, noting a domestic violence incident while she was serving as mayor in Citrus Heights where a man came out of an apartment and fired shots at police.

    Frost formerly served a four-year term on the Citrus Heights City Council before being elected to the Sacramento County Board of Supervisor’s in 2016. She became chair of the board earlier this year, after being reelected in 2020.

    To watch Supervisor Frost’s full one-hour town hall meeting, click here.

  • GUEST OPINION: Defunding police would make us less safe

    GUEST OPINION: Defunding police would make us less safe

    Guest opinion by Sue Frost–
    The killing of George Floyd was horrific — and the officers responsible have been arrested and will stand trial. But now politicians and activists are blaming everyone in a uniform. “Defund the police” has become the rallying call for protesters.

    Activists want to strip money from law-enforcement, disband police, close jails and prisons, then divert public funds to community groups, counselors, and social workers for “community empowerment.”

    What does that mean? It means instead of the Citrus Heights Police Department and sheriffs enforcing the law, taxpayer funds will go to private nonprofits run by activists and programs like “Advance Peace,” which pays gang members $500 a month not to shoot each other.

    How will reducing the number of police officers make Citrus Heights safer? In 2018, police officers nationally arrested 11,970 murder suspects, 495,900 violent criminals, and more than one million drunk driving suspects.

    In February of this year, a months-long investigation resulted in 518 arrests when police smashed a human trafficking ring and rescued hundreds of children who were being sold into prostitution.

    Do activists think that counselors and community groups are going to detain violent gang members, break human trafficking rings, or get drunk drivers off our roads? No alternative to an organized, well-funded, and well-trained police force offers enforcement ability on such a high level.

    In Los Angeles, Mayor Eric Garcetti recently announced that he was going to “defund police” by cutting $150 million from the LAPD budget. Cities like San Francisco, Portland, Minneapolis, and Baltimore have announced that they will pursue efforts to “defund police.” Political “leaders” in Congress and State houses have echoed the call and introduced legislation to cut funding for law enforcement — or punish jurisdictions who refuse to do so.

    The vast majority of police budgets go to personnel, so the budget cut means one thing: firing police officers. Which officers will be fired? A common practice for addressing mass budget reductions through layoffs — and that has been used by the LAPD in the past — is LIFO (last in, first out).

    That means that Garcetti’s “defund” policy will result in firing recent recruits — young Black, Asian and Latino officers who were recruited from, and reflect, the very neighborhoods who are underrepresented and suffer the most from crime.

    Sadly, this movement is not new. In 2015 Camden New Jersey pushed a “defund police” measure. They dismantled their department and disbanded the police officers’ union. They placed some activists in oversight positions and hired most the police back — at a lower salary.

    Some believe the effort was really more about breaking the union than reforming the system. Today, many of the same complaints have returned.

    Eliminating law enforcement is the opposite of a solution — we cannot abandon our communities to the whims of gangs and criminals who prey on neighborhoods.

    We do need to encourage investment in poor neighborhoods where crime is rampant, schools are failing, and hope is abandoned. Empowerment zones, school choice, and incentives for investment have seen tremendous success.

    Communities that partner with police, rather than fight with them, have seen a marked improvement in crime reduction, complaints against police, and more recruitment of people from the community into law enforcement — community members who have relationships and earnestly want to make lives better — and have the training to enforce the law.

    This rush to respond to “defund police” activists is not reform — it is retribution and appeasement. And it is dangerous. The result will be every community and every resident will be less safe.

    We need more community engagement and understanding, not less. We should be investing in more training, recruiting, and community engagement, not eliminating prisons and defunding police.

    Sue Frost, supervisor
    Sue Frost

    Sacramento County Supervisor Sue Frost formerly served as a Citrus Heights councilwoman and currently represents District 4, which includes Citrus Heights. She can be contacted at (916) 874-5491, or SupervisorFrost@saccounty.net.

    Want to share your own thoughts on this topic or another local issue? Submit a letter to the editor or opinion column for publication: Click here