Category: Letters to the Editor

  • LETTERS: home prices, potholes, neighborhood blight

    LETTERS: home prices, potholes, neighborhood blight

    Citrus Heights, Home sale
    A home on the 7300 block of Cross Drive recently sold for over $600,000. // Bethany Reeves

    Latest letters to the editor comment on housing price trends in Citrus Heights, potholes, blight in neighborhoods, and rental housing inspections.

    Housing prices are going up, and that’s good news for the city
    [RE: This Citrus Heights home sold for over $600k, a sale price once unheard of; July 19] There was an article last month about a house on Cross Drive that sold for over $600,000. Well, who’d a thunk the trend stretched all the way over to Area 10’s Community Drive — where sneakers occasionally hang over the telephone lines and potholes eat up my Smart car. A street of an eclectic blend of houses that need — or have had — demolition or renovation. How about that house now for sale at 7602 Community Drive for $525,000? It’s gorgeous in the photos provided by the realtor. A long private driveway going to a dying breed of large lot offerings (0.36 acres) with just 1827 square feet of house built in 2000? I think we are seeing a upward trend in housing costs — which is good news for the city, who looks to get back our property taxes from the county in 2022. Now if we could just pave the street there!
    -Jayna Karpinski-Costa, Citrus Heights

    Four problems with Citrus Heights and deteriorating neighborhoods
    [Citrus Heights council votes 4-1 to move forward with mandatory rental inspections; Aug. 12] First, residents of rental property that are in bad shape will opt out because they would be afraid of rental increases.
    Second, the City of Citrus Heights at present will not remove cars that are not licensed or registered on streets like Mauana, etc. Why is this? The city has spent millions on cleaning up Sayonara Drive and yet leaves these cars on the streets which creates an eyesore and deteriorates the neighborhood. Some of these duplexes are owner occupied. How do you expect the owners to improve the area? We have heard that a resident’s friends are parking there because their cars will not be towed. Third, how about cars parked on lawns? This further deteriorates the neighborhood. Fourth, if the city cannot police the rules, it makes it harder for the landlord.
    -Diana Beals, Fair Oaks

    Want to share your own thoughts about a local issue or recent news article? Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • LETTER: Why should only rental owners pay for code enforcement?

    LETTER: Why should only rental owners pay for code enforcement?

    Submitted by Citrus Heights resident Raj Reddy–
    [RE: Citrus Heights council votes 4-1 to move forward with mandatory rental inspections; Aug. 12th] According to the City Council Staff Report for the proposed rental inspection program, page 181 states that there were 1300 code enforcement calls and on average 27% of the code enforcement calls were attributed to rental properties. So that means 351 calls were related to rental properties. What were the other 949 calls related to?

    Since 27% represents a minority of calls, why are only the rental housing owners being forced to pay? Why not make everyone in Citrus Heights pay this code enforcement fee since the majority of calls are not rental housing related.

    Want to share your own thoughts on a local topic? Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • Citrus Heights reader voices: rental inspections, code enforcement

    Citrus Heights reader voices: rental inspections, code enforcement

    Latest reader voices include responses to the city council’s 4-1 vote in favor of mandatory rental inspections, with some arguing inspections are needed to protect tenants and crack down on slumlords, while others argue the move is a government overreach that will cause landlords to pass added costs on to renters.

    Question about code enforcement and rental inspections
    [RE: Citrus Heights council votes 4-1 to move forward with mandatory rental inspections]  Since those calling to complain about possible code enforcements cannot see inside the house or apartment, and they are usually not qualified to determine if the property is safe inside and all utilities functioning properly, how does this ordinance address the 1,300 calls to code enforcements? Usually code enforcements have to do with the outside of the dwelling. Unkept front yards, weeds and grass long and dry and fire hazards, cars on side walks, garbage/ garbage cans left out, construction without permit, new fences and other unsightly items usually get code enforcement calls.
    -Jim Monteton, Citrus Heights

    From Facebook:

    Jackie H. — I think this is needed, but I also know rents will get raised even higher. I’ve lived in a duplex neighborhood for 23 years because, for the size, we couldn’t afford to buy a house and our rent was manageable. Our place was built in the 70’s and has never been inspected. We finally got our a/c unit replaced after 23 years (they installed an incorrect unit as we were moving in) and now our rent has been raised to reflect this. The siding is badly warped with holes in places and peeling, pulling away in others. Our fence is the original one and is also in desperate need of fixing. Our property manager and owners have viewed these issues and neither are concerned with fixing it. They would rather put quick-fix bandages on the worst of the problems than fix it… I’ve lived here a lot of years and have maintained it like my own home, but there are some things we simply can’t do and getting maintenance from my owners or property manager takes legal threats to make happen. I wish I could move, but the fact is that even with my horrible management and recent rent raise, I can’t afford to move.

    Ashley S. — [D]epending on the standards they set, some landlords may avoid the area to avoid mandatory fixing costs. It’s not just the $95/year. It’s also whatever “violations” are required to be fixed or updated. Depends what they’ll be able to cite you for and the cost of citations as well. Just another perspective. I don’t agree one way or the other.

    Lora G. — Maybe this will help keep the riff-raff out of renting residential homes with no accountability from the owner. We have owners that rent out to all sorts of shady characters with no concern to the long time residents who own their homes. The homes and yards at these rentals are not maintained and look trashed, abandoned and derelict. Dead trees, shrubs and dead three-foot tall weeds. Paint peeling off, and downed decrepit fences. Rats and multiple non-working cars parked on the street and driveway.

    Larry T. — It ain’t none of their business I don’t know why they’re sticking their heads somewhere they don’t belong. The city should have nothing to do with privately owned domiciles, and apartments and duplexes.

    Elyse M. — This will not improve anything in the city of Citrus Heights… just like it didn’t improve anything in Sacramento… What this is, is purely a revenue generator.

    Pam N. — It’s about time; I really think it should be yearly, vigilantly, and if they raise the rent after repairs, fine the owner and make it hurt. Make [the] fine very high!

    Cassandra N. — This increased cost will be pushed on the renters here… so, no, I’m not on board.

    Mary A. — A lot of rentals are infested with so many bugs and no one does anything. It’s time, for the price that is being charged, to make things right .

    Sue A. — Unfortunately the RENTERS will be paying for this one way or another! Rents are already unbelievably high!

    Want to share your own thoughts? Post a comment on our Facebook Page, or click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • Letter: Citrus Heights needs a full-time mayor

    By Citrus Heights resident Lynn Avery–
    “What’s it all about Alfie? Is it only the moment we live?” I have read letters to the editor and other comments about the “growth of Citrus Heights” and the dedication to covering every piece of unimproved, taxable land in our city limits. I cannot help but think of the above song.

    It nauseates me that our Planning Commission appears to pander to proposals that cite every minuscule wrinkle in zoning requirements and expect project approval from the City Council. (Knowledgeable preparation, weighing neighborhood concerns, sewage, water supply, and traffic concerns are not adequately studied before approvals are rubber stamped.)

    Related: Planning Commission votes 5-1 in favor of 260-home development in Citrus Heights

    We have a fractured City! We have no core. One area does not know what another is doing, or what their specific problems may be (and who cares)? Remember the old saying “Divide and Conquer” — it has happened here in Citrus Heights.

    Many of us think that it is time to elect a qualified mayor. A part-time city council only is no longer in the best interest of our City. We need an accountable, experienced mayor to guide our City and preclude private interests from bulldozing a non-professional Planning Commission that often leads to automatic approval from the City Council.

    Want to share your own thoughts on a local topic? Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • Letters: Pet-a-Palooza, future of old Sylvan Middle School site

    Sylvan Middle School, demolition
    An excavator finishes demolition work on the first building to go at the old Sylvan Middle School in Citrus Heights on Feb. 7, 2017. // CH Sentinel

    Updated May 12, 9:52 p.m.–
    Latest letters and comments from Sentinel readers discuss Pet-a-Palooza and potential future uses for the old Sylvan Middle School property.

    Hoping Pet-a-Palooza comes back next year
    [RE: Q&A: Why wasn’t Pet-a-Palooza held in Citrus Heights this year?]  Our family really missed Pet-a-Palooza in Rusch Park this year! We go every year with our dog and it is such a fun community event! So many of our neighbors were dismayed to hear we weren’t having it in Rusch Park this year. It has been a wonderful event and we all hope it comes back in 2019.
    -Roxanne Gray, Citrus Heights

    Pet-a-Palooza needs a new corporate sponsor. Dignity Health?
    [RE: Q&A: Why wasn’t Pet-a-Palooza held in Citrus Heights this year?]  Sounds like we need a new corporate sponsor for this event like Dignity Health.
    -Tom Scheeler, Citrus Heights

    From Facebook:

    RE: How about a Performing Arts Center at the old Sylvan school site? (Letter; May 6)

    Aimee P.I couldn’t agree more. Citrus Heights needs to provide opportunity for people to evolve to their highest purpose. Consumerism and diabetes are rampant. We don’t need more shops and crappy food. We also have enough check cashing, pawn shops, discount and liquor stores, too many in fact. We need something to attract people to the city not repel them.

    Dustin I. — How about parking for the sports that already take place in that field so the disrespectful littering parents don’t congest neighborhood street’s and disturb homeowners with the constant door slams and honking horns and alarms.

    Denise T. — How about some housing for the homeless. Give me a break, some people [have] their head in the sand.

    Nicole W. — I am for the sports complex, played on those fields with Sunrise Girls Softball and went to Sylvan for Jr. High. But I am loving the performing arts center, but only if you revamp Rush Park sports area. A rec center would be great, all year round. Then I would vote yes for the performing arts center. 

    Andy H. — I’d like to know what the cities plans are when we get property tax revenues infused into our budget? I’d like to see things like a performance center, our fire department, libraries, and school district. I know it’s far fetched but aren’t these things we should aspire to?

    RE: Why wasn’t Pet-a-Palooza held in Citrus Heights this year? (Q&A; May 6)

    Olivia D. — I didn’t go this year because it was at William Land Park…  I hope they do bring it back to Rusch, then I will continue to go.

    Jenny W. — I was bummed we didn’t have it this year in our town. I really enjoyed it.

    Want to share your own thoughts? Post a comment on our Facebook Page, or click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • Letter: How about a Performing Arts Center at the old Sylvan school site?

    Letter: How about a Performing Arts Center at the old Sylvan school site?

    Sylvan Corners, Citrus Heights
    File photo, Sylvan Corners.

    By Citrus Heights resident Lynn Avery–
    Several citizen groups and community supporters have been discussing ideas for the old Sylvan Middle School property. There are also rumblings that private business entities are looking at the land for commercial ventures.

    That acreage was used for a “SCHOOL” (to educate our children) and filled a true and important need and for posterity of our city. There are many areas for “sports complexes” in our city perimeters — already in place. We have enough burger joints, pizza parlors, and fast food restaurants to service two cities.

    Currently in the Sylvan Corners area there are at least seven of these establishments within a 1/8th mile circumference, plus one restaurant. The fast food availability at the Walmart/Costco complex offers several more — plus, now the newest plan is to put three more fast food joints in front of Costco/Walmart. Has our city and planning commission gone crazy by approving this “carnival of food?”

    Why don’t we entertain a new and positive idea for the enhancement of our city? How about the city buying the property? How about building a “Performance Arts Center?” All of our surrounding city neighbors have done it.

    We have talked about elevating our city’s image. Let’s offer some higher level cultural opportunities. We shouldn’t have to lose our students and families to other areas where cultural arts are offered.

    Enough of tax-based businesses! Let’s look to the future of our youth and local talent and encourage the arts — not everyone is interested in sports or fast food. Maybe some food for thought?

    Want to share your own thoughts on the future of the old Sylvan site? Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • Letters: city beautification, wall mural, new sports facility in Citrus Heights?

    Letters: city beautification, wall mural, new sports facility in Citrus Heights?

    Sylvan Corners, Citrus Heights
    File photo, Sylvan Corners.

    Latest letters and comments from Sentinel readers continue to discuss potential future uses for the old Sylvan Middle School property and also express praise for volunteer Ron Fern and his beautification efforts along Auburn Boulevard.

    Thanks to volunteer for making Auburn Blvd more beautiful
    [RE: Meet the man who’s beautifying Auburn Blvd one flower at a time; Feb. 24]  Thank you for your story on Ron Fern. My wife and I have wondered who was doing the work of maintaining the flowers along that part of Auburn Boulevard. We appreciate his work and wanted to thank him for the beautification of the roadside. His work has a contribution to Citrus Heights and to public enjoyment of beauty. Thank you Ron.
    -Norman Hill, Citrus Heights

    A mural along Auburn Blvd would be great
    [RE: Meet the man who’s beautifying Auburn Blvd one flower at a time; Feb. 24]  I love what this man has done on Auburn Boulevard. Every time I drive by when the flowers are blooming I silently thank him. However, I recently thought how nice it would be to have a nicely painted fence behind his flowers, since the fence has been painted different colors I’m assuming because of graffiti. The article indicates there may be something in the future for a plan to paint this fence. Even if it was painted a solid color, it would improve the looks. But having high school kids paint a mural would be even better. Citrus Heights City Council, can you help make this happen?
    -Joan Bippus, Citrus Heights

    From Facebook:

    RE: Community survey seeks input on future use of old Sylvan Middle School site

    Justin H.I know it has been discussed before and the city stance is that youth sports facilities will not generate revenue, which I do understand. However, the youth sports facilities in Citrus Heights are all very dated, possibly the best park for baseball/softball Rusch Park has adult leagues most nights and weekends. To not have the option on the table to take this opportunity and turn it into a youth facility for current and future youth in Citrus Heights is a travesty. Softball and soccer use this facility currently year round, and an updated new facility would generate a lot of interest. Housing or more retail space (with locations empty right across the street already and more going in front of Walmart and Costco) seems disingenuous and a money grab. I am all for making money, but… quality of life and activities for the current residents in this city should be taken into account.

    Brian W. We don’t need more housing or stores. We need more family things to do in this city. I was raised and been here for 38 years now and I have seen this city grow, houses been built and stores come and go. When was the last time this city thought of the residents that already live here and built something family friendly that we all can enjoy. A sports complex would be great, with some BBQ’s and kids play area, etc.

    Laurin L. — Low income subsidized housing is not the answer. A park is not the answer. That’d be a magnet for transients and homeless. A multi-use sports facility would be welcomed by many!

    Wendy S.The youth are starving for a sports facility that is a healthy place — a Sunrise Soccer Club player was accidentally stabbed with a hypodermic needle at one of the parks. Any of the soccer fields at any of the schools and parks are full of pot holes. There is no place for any softball as all the fields are taken up by baseball and adult leagues. A sports complex would bring some revenue in — local sports clubs would be able to host games, tournaments, etc. SJUSD doesn’t have the money to do anything with this property. The city should build something that will benefit the youth of Citrus Heights.

    Want to share your own thoughts? Post a comment on our Facebook Page, or click here to submit a letter to the editor.

  • Letter: Citrus Heights street is full of potholes, dangerous for handicapped

    Letter: Citrus Heights street is full of potholes, dangerous for handicapped

    Highland Avenue, Citrus Heights
    Highland Avenue connects Sunrise Boulevard and Mariposa Avenue in Citrus Heights. // CH Sentinel

    By Dan Egebretsen, Citrus Heights resident–
    [RE: Guest Opinion: here’s why our roads are in horrible condition; Jan. 25th]  Our family has lived off of Highland Avenue since 1986. As many know, Highland is a major cut-through from Sylvan Road and Mariposa Avenue to Sunrise Boulevard. When we moved here, Highland Avenue had patches and potholes. In 32 years here, that has not changed.

    For the last 20 of those years, my wife has been in a power wheelchair, and trips for her to the store can be interesting to say the least. Most of the street does not have sidewalks, and the parts that do are not ADA compliant — since the telephone poles are planted right in the middle of the sidewalk, forcing her to go into the street and around parked cars. This is especially dangerous on the blind hill by the Methodist church. Somehow, she and other wheelchair-bound neighbors haven’t been killed yet by cars speeding over the hill.

    We’ve seen Auburn Boulevard redone several times, frequently to the detriment of local business owners. We’ve seen side streets such as Pacheco Way repaved, but nothing has been done about Highland Avenue. Is it going to take the death of a handicapped person before anything is done?

    Phone calls have not even garnered a response, and written letters have been ignored. Is this how the City of Citrus Heights works… beautify the main roads, and to hell with the rest?

    Want to share your own thoughts on roads or another local issue? Click here to submit a letter to the editor for publication.

  • Letter: new townhouse rentals will be a great update for Sylvan Corners

    Bearpaw Village Townhouses
    A rendering included in a planning division staff report shows what proposed townhouses would look like near Sylvan Corners in Citrus Heights.

    By Jennifer Haley, Citrus Heights resident–
    [RE: Public hearing set for 42-unit housing proposed near Sylvan Corners; Jan. 20]  The proposed housing on Sylvan Corners is what Citrus Heights needs: an update. There are far too many under utilized stores and restaurants in Citrus Heights, and bringing more people in will decrease this issue and give renters the ability to increase their square footage and have a garage. Townhomes are great to rent while you are investigating areas to purchase a home in. It would be wonderful for the people of Citrus Heights to have updated housing which they can rent when they may not yet be ready to settle down with a mortgage.

    I believe that the [neighborhood association] that is opposing this has not considered the fact that their suggestion of owning a home on a major intersection would be of little interest to anyone looking to purchase a home, being that Citrus Heights already has many homes for sale on less busy roads that have sat with for-sale signs for months on end. I do hope that this ends up being approved so that Citrus Heights can increase the updates which it most rightly deserves.

    *Editor’s note: following the submission of this letter, this project was approved by a 5-1 vote of the planning commission on Jan. 24, 2018

    Additional comments from Facebook:
    Denise M. — That looks to be a very confined space. There is other open area in Citrus Heights that could be proposed. And what kind of rental housing would this be? I agree. If I lived in the nearby neighborhood, I would oppose… Come on Citrus Heights Planning. You can do better than this.

    Payton P. — Millennials don’t buy houses, and there is a severe lacking in nice apartment rentals in Citrus Heights. Most are old, outdated and un-secure. In order to move with the future, Sacramento County needs to step up with things like this, especially if you don’t want Citrus Heights to turn into the next North Highlands or Fairfield.

    Sharon D. — During high traffic times, it takes me sometimes 15-plus minutes to drive from Walmart area to Sunrise Boulevard. If those new restaurants open in area, plus the added cars from this project, (it) will make this route a nightmare for us living in this neighborhood.

    Want to share your thoughts on the Bearpaw housing project? Click here to submit a letter to the editor for publication.

  • Letter: Warren is wrong on Citrus Heights pill bottle lock purchase

    Letter: Warren is wrong on Citrus Heights pill bottle lock purchase

    Letter submitted by Jeannie Bruins, vice mayor of Citrus Heights–
    On Jan. 10, 2018, on the Community Forum page, the Citrus Heights Sentinel included a guest opinion piece from David Warren titled ‘Citrus Heights lacks safe disposal spots for unused drugs.’ 

    In the article, Mr. Warren writes, “The City Council purchased a significant number of ‘secured’ pill bottles for distribution to residents in an effort to reduce substance abuse.” I don’t know how Mr. Warren came to believe that because it is not true.

    See original article by David Warren: Guest Opinion: Citrus Heights lacks safe disposal spots for unused drugs

    Councilman Bret Daniels, who is the councilman Mr. Warren references as running for sheriff (which is true), brought the concept of secured pill bottle tops to the council during his council comments at a city council meeting. Councilman Jeff Slowey (who was mayor at the time) responded that it should be an agendized item at a future council meeting for discussion. Councilman Daniels had also approached Supervisor Sue Frost with the project and she provided $6,000 in funding to pay for the secure pill bottle tops. The City Council did not purchase any tops. Councilman Daniels purchased them with the funds he received from Supervisor Frost.

    This response does not address the worthiness, or lack thereof, of this purchase, but is just offered to set the record straight that the City Council did not purchase the secured pill bottle tops.

    Have a different perspective on this topic or another local issue? The Sentinel welcomes letters to the editor and guest opinion columns on local issues from Citrus Heights residents. Click here to submit one.